Moon.com fees: charges, examples and uncertainties

Moon publishes a 1% opening fee on the wager and a minimum 10% performance fee on realised profit. Holding-fee terms need clarification. We explain the known charges without assuming a discount for ACES.

Start with the calculation base

A percentage needs a base. Moon’s opening fee is calculated on the money wagered. Leverage changes exposure, so a fee on the wager should not be compared directly with another venue’s fee on notional exposure.

ChargePublished basisLimit of the evidence
Opening1% of the wagerNo ACES reduction independently confirmed
PerformanceMinimum 10% of realised profitThe minimum is not a fixed final rate
HoldingPermitted under the termsCurrent interval, rate and base unconfirmed
Pricing edgeDescribed in the operator’s termsNot a fixed percentage established by this guide

An opening-fee example

A $100 wager at the published 1% rate has a $1 opening fee. This is the opening fee alone. It does not describe total cost, settlement or a code benefit.

Moon shows applicable fees before confirmation. Read the current fee article and the public Fee Structure dialog on Moon.com.

The performance-fee minimum is not the full model

The published minimum applies to realised profit. The public ROI Fee dialog uses an interactive model. Asset, leverage, wager and execution conditions can matter. A calculation that simply subtracts the minimum rate cannot promise your final payout.

Moon says displayed profit or loss includes estimated closing execution and applicable performance fees. Final settlement can differ as market conditions change.

Why we cannot state a holding interval

The current fee article omits holding fees. Section 8.5 of Moon’s terms still permits them. We have not confirmed the current interval, rate or calculation base. An omission from one article does not prove the charge was removed.

We withdrew the earlier fixed-interval wording. See the holding-fee evidence for the source difference and the questions still open.

How to interpret a displayed rate

A standard 1% rate does not prove that your referral attribution failed. We have not confirmed a lower ACES rate. Ask official support to explain an account-specific offer before relying on it.

Keep the wager amount, fee category and quoted rate separate when checking a cost. Avoid treating a simulated example as a record of an executed bet.

Where rakeback fits

For an eligible, activated account, rakeback can return part of qualifying fees. It does not remove other costs or betting losses. Our rakeback guide explains the calculation and the activation limits.

Sources

References for this guide. The review notes below include dates and questions we have not yet resolved.

Review notes
Sources differ ·
The current fee article omits holding fees. Section 8.5 of Moon’s terms still permits them. We have not confirmed the current interval, rate or calculation base.
Operator statement ·
Moon says displayed profit or loss includes estimated closing execution and applicable performance fees. Final settlement can differ as market conditions change.
Not confirmed ·
We have not independently confirmed a fee discount for ACES. The referral landing page is not evidence of a discount or its eligibility rules.
Operator statement ·
Moon’s current rakeback article names opening fees and fees on profitable closed bets. We have not confirmed whether holding fees currently qualify.
  1. How do the fees on Moon work?Moon help centre
  2. Terms of service: operator, eligibility and feesMoon.com
  3. Referral URL shared by this site (not proof of a benefit)Moon.com
  4. What is rakeback, how it works and how to get it?Moon help centre